The great music biz money pit: How streaming services have lost $1bn

187 shares

Ljung“We’re a high-growth start-up. It’s a very common path. The reason you raise money is to invest it into growth before you focus on profitability.”

SoundCloud co-founder Alexander Ljung (pictured) has his excuses ready for the company’s heavy losses.

In 2014, KPMG suggested that SoundCloud’s immediate requirement for investment represented “a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern”.

That investment did arrive, to the tune of more than $100m – made up of $77m financing secured in 2015 and a further $37m (€32m) from a debt facility at the start of this year.

In addition to keeping SoundCloud afloat, this cash is being stretched to launch new subscription service Go, which arrives in the UK today.

SoundCloud is certainly not alone in its grow-first, profit later mentality.

Yet the myriad music biz startups which echo Ljung’s strategy simply can’t keep burning money forever.

And at the end of last year, we saw the evidence.

Rdio was many people’s favourite streaming platform before it crashed into bankruptcy in November, owing the music industry $30m.

According to its Chapter 11 filing, the company was bringing in around $1.6m a month from subscribers and advertising – but was losing $2m a month overall.

Remember that figure: $2m a month. You’ll see why.

Now, let’s take a look at how much the following services are losing – and have lost – in comparison…


Deezer_LogoDeezer

According to documents associated with Deezer’s failed IPO attempt last year, the company lost €27.18m ($31.5m) in 2014, on revenues of €141.9m ($164.4m).

That’s a average monthly loss of $2.67m. More than Rdio.

Cumulatively, in the three-and-a-half years from 2012 to the end of the first half of 2015, Deezer posted $99.5m (€87m) in net losses.


napsterRhapsody/Napster

According to its latest annual financial filing, Rhapsody/Napster posted $201.9 million in revenue in 2015 – but annual losses widened considerably to $35.5m.

That’s a average monthly loss of $2.96m. More than Rdio.

Cumulatively, in the three years from 2013 to the end of of 2015, Rhapsody/Napster posted $71.5m (€87m) in net losses.


tidal-1TIDAL

The only financial information we have on TIDAL comes from before its purchase by Jay Z’s Project Panther Bidco last year for $56m.

Aspiro AB posted a net loss of 84.1m SEK ($10.6m) for the 2014 calendar year, off the back of a 22% increase in net revenues.

That’s an average monthly loss of $833,000.

Less than Rdio – though you’d have to assume that since being Jay Z’d, its marketing expenditure has grown dramatically.


guvera_logo_whiteGUVERA

Australian-born streaming service Guvera claims more than 10m subscribers worldwide – with a significant presence in India.

Yet the company’s financial results follow a familiar path for streaming services.

Thanks to the Australian business press, we know that Guvera posted an AU$81.1m (US$61.2m) net loss in its latest fiscal year to end of July 2015.

That’s an average monthly loss of $5.1m. More than Rdio.

In addition, Guvera recently upgraded its FY 2014 net loss to AU$29.4m (US $22.4m).

Across 2014 and 2015, then, its cumulative loss hit US $83.6m.


PandoraPandora

According to its annual financial filing for last year, Pandora lost $169.7m in 2015, on revenues of $1.16bn

That’s an average monthly loss of $14.14m. Far more than Rdio.

There are extenuating circumstances: Pandora paid out a $65.4m chunk of a legal settlement with major record companies in the year.

However, in Q1 2016 alone, the company posted a net loss of $115.1m.

That’s an average monthly loss of $38.4m. Far, far, far more than Rdio.

Cumulatively, in the three years and three months from 2013 to Q1 2016, Pandora posted $355.9m in net losses. Oucha.


soundcloudSoundCloud

Alexander Ljung might not particularly care about profitability right now, but some of his investors may see things differently.

As mentioned, the last financial results we have for SoundCloud are 2014’s.

They show annual revenues of $19.4m (€17.35m), with net losses hitting a wince-worthy $44.2m (€39.14m).

That’s an average monthly net loss of $3.7m. More than Rdio.

Cumulatively, over the three years from 2012 to end of 2014, SoundCloud posted $85.4m in net losses.


SPOTIFYSpotify

Unlike SoundCloud, Spotify’s annual revenue is much greater than its losses – and it’s already paying out around 70% of all income to music rights-holders.

That’s a figure which may have to be re-negotiated if the company ever needs to dive back into the black.

It won’t for a while: the billion dollars of debt-based investment Spotify just took on (under pretty taxing conditions) will see to that.

Still, its balance sheet contains some scary stuff.

The last financial results we have for Daniel Ek’s company are for 2014 (although 2015’s figures are due soon).

In that year, Spotify posted revenues of $1.25bn (€1.08bn) but an annual net loss of $188m (€162m).

That’s an average monthly net loss of $13.5m. Around seven times more than Rdio.

It’s going to get worse before it gets better.

From 2013 to 2014, Spotify’s operating loss (a better reflection of performance trends than net loss) widened from €91.2m to €165.1m  – an increase of 81%.

If that trend applies to its overall fiscal performance in 2015, Spotify’s annual net losses will grow to around $340m – or $28.3m a month.

Much more than Rdio.

Cumulatively, over the three years from 2012 to end of 2014, Spotify posted a net loss of $355.2m.


So what have we learned?

Well, the biggest independent streaming services in the US and Europe are losing millions of dollars every month (caveat: that’s a bit of an assumption when it comes to TIDAL).

Therefore, they all require gigantic levels of future investment to deal with their cash burn.

Not a huge problem for the likes of Spotify ($1bn recently secured) or Deezer ($110m recently secured).

But when you look at platforms such as Rhapsody/Napster, and its 3.5m subscribers, things look a little more fragile.

(The company took on a $10m loan from Real Networks and an unnamed co-owner last March – money which, according to our net loss analysis, would have lasted it just over three months.)

The headline stat from all of the above though: across three (and a bit) fiscal year periods, these streaming services cumulatively lost…

$1.06 billion.

That’s not even counting smaller players like Qobuz, Milk Music, MixRadio, Saavn and 8Tracks. (Or Rdio, for that matter).

Plus, we don’t really know how healthy the likes of Apple Music, Google Play Music, Amazon Prime Music and YouTube are as standalone entities.

More cash on the bonfire, no doubt.

As the years roll by, the stakes (and flames) of the streaming music market will get higher, and the expense will become increasingly intolerable.

Rdio’s death was a shock to the music business.

It won’t be the last.Music Business Worldwide

Related Posts

  • bobo65

    All Ponzi schemes that bilked investors out of billions!

    • Aaron Smart

      These companies are just paying their employees way too much and spending wayyyyy too much money Spotify it showed was already having revenues much greater than its losses but they just turn that around to get more money given to them They need to pay artists more and make less and run as a computer metals and that’s it done fuck off

      • FeisalK

        Music labels are making the money – for every paying subscriber in each of the services, labels take and average 70% of the revenue ON TOP of the flat hefty licensing fee to enable premium services

        that’s 30% remaining to go operational costs, salaries, infrastructure etc etc

        Labels are the ones who should be paying the artists more

        • Aaron Smart

          No the royalty rate they are paying is dogshit less than internet radio or possibly the same not anywhere near what on demand or actually on your device should be

          • FeisalK

            Who is paying royalties? streaming services don’t pay royalties, they pay the labels.

  • Theo Sakyi

    I know nothing about the music business. Is there really that much demand for this many services? How many features could they possibly have to differentiate themselves from one another?