Dua Lipa Levitating remix lawsuit dismissed, more than three years after it was filed by talkbox artist Bosko Kante

Credit: Fred Duval/Shutterstock
Dua Lipa

A copyright lawsuit brought by talkbox artist Bosko Kante against Dua Lipa over remixes of her 2020 hit Levitating has been dismissed.

Kante, Lipa, Levitating co-writer and producer Stephen Kozmeniuk, and Warner Records agreed to end the case in a joint filing lodged in federal court in Los Angeles on Monday (November 9).

The filing, obtained by MBW and signed by lawyers for both sides in late October, can be read in full here.

“The entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice,” the filing states – meaning Kante cannot bring the same claims again.

Under the filing’s terms, Kante and the defendants will each pay their own costs and legal fees.

The two-page filing does not say whether the two sides reached a settlement, and it discloses no financial terms.

Kante sued in July 2023, as MBW reported at the time.

He claimed that a talkbox performance he recorded for Levitating had been used without his permission on three remixes of the track.

Kante is a co-founder of ElectroSpit, which makes a wearable talkbox – a device that lets a performer shape the sound of a synthesizer or other instrument with their mouth.

The remixes cited in the complaint were The Blessed Madonna‘s version featuring Madonna and Missy Elliott, the version featuring DaBaby, and a remix created for the American Music Awards.

(Kante‘s original complaint named Warner Music Group as a defendant; later versions named Warner Records, the WMG label that released Levitating.)

The original complaint sought at least USD $2 million in damages, plus the profits made from the remixes, which it estimated at more than $20 million.

It also asked the court to rule that Kante owned or co-owned the copyright in all three remixes, and to bar the defendants from exploiting them any further.

According to the complaint, Kozmeniuk approached Kante in or around 2019 about recording a talkbox part for Levitating.

Kante‘s complaint states that “no written agreement, including any sort of ‘work for hire’ was ever executed.”

Instead, it alleges, Kante and the defendants struck an oral deal.

Under that deal, the complaint states, the defendants “were to pay Plaintiff the sum of $1,500, plus a share of neighboring rights to the track based on a split between 7 musicians (including Plaintiff), as well [as] provide a credit to Plaintiff for his work on the track. Additionally, and most importantly, it was explicitly agreed that there would be no reuse or sampling of Plaintiff’s Work beyond the use for the original version of the track, Levitating.”

“All three remixes sampled and incorporated a greater amount of Plaintiff’s Work than that used in the original version, including, but not limited to, additional lyrics and melody that were created by Plaintiff, which do not appear in the original version,” Kante‘s complaint alleges.

The complaint singled out one version, stating that “it was the DaBaby Remix that was the most successful version of Levitating.”

As of September 2024, the DaBaby remix had 2.145 billion streams on Spotify, compared to 984 million for the album version, according to figures published by MBW.

Levitating spent 77 weeks on the Billboard Hot 100 between 2020 and 2022.

“Plaintiff made numerous attempts to resolve this matter short of litigation, but such efforts were unsuccessful, due to Defendants’ unwillingness to cooperate or accept responsibility for this blatant infringement of Plaintiff’s copyrights,” the July 2023 complaint states.

Lipa and her co-defendants asked the court to throw out the copyright claim in 2024, arguing that Kante had failed to pin down which parts of his recording appeared in the remixes.

Judge Hernán D. Vera rejected that argument in September 2024, though he granted the defendants’ separate request to dismiss a claim seeking an accounting of Warner’s earnings from the remixes, finding it preempted by federal copyright law.

“There is no requirement that Plaintiff be made to identify, second-by-second, which portions were used,” Judge Vera wrote in his ruling.

The judge also noted that, at a court hearing, “Defendants’ counsel conceded that at least some portion of the Kante Recording was used.”

With the case now dismissed, no court or jury will decide whether Kante‘s alleged oral deal for the original recording also covered its remixes.

The case had been due to go to trial in March 2027.

Kante‘s lawsuit followed two earlier copyright cases over Levitating, both filed in 2022.

In June 2023, a federal judge in California dismissed a suit from reggae band Artikal Sound System, which had alleged that Levitating infringed its 2017 track Live Your Life.

Judge Sunshine S. Sykes found that the band had failed to adequately allege that the creators of Levitating had ever had a chance to hear its song.

The judge gave the band until June 16 to amend its complaint, but just two days after her ruling it agreed with the defendants to dismiss the case with prejudice.

In March 2025, a federal judge in New York granted summary judgment in Lipa’s favor in a case brought by the publishing companies of songwriters L. Russell Brown and Sandy Linzer.

That suit claimed Levitating copied Wiggle and Giggle All Night, a 1979 disco song the pair wrote, and Don Diablo, a 1980 song to which they had acquired the rights.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla found that the musical elements the songs shared were not protected by copyright.

Kante was himself named as a defendant in the original complaints in both 2022 cases. The Brown and Linzer complaint said he claimed “copyright and authorship credit” for Levitating.Music Business Worldwide

Related Posts